Choreographer's Diary
by Leigh Witchel
Day 23 - August 26, 1999
21 days until the performance.
Chuck and I have decided
to meet for a half an hour today and three times next week to
run the ballet. Since it's a brief rehearsal he goes over sequence
once and the runs the ballet. Today, we work almost entirely
on questions of endurance. A marathon can't be run like a sprint.
In the same way, a six minute solo dance can't be danced at the
same energy level as a
classical variation of under a minute. Chuck takes an easy and
efficient pace, pushing himself harder for the technical sections
(which are concentrated in two areas, almost like competitive
skating or gymnastics floor exercises.) He gets through it, which
makes us both very pleased, especially since he isn't back in
shape after the ten days off yet. I tell him to make sure that
his interior focus is to that imaginary balcony for the
entire dance, and also encourage him to have someone else look
at it. I'm pleased with the work and can see my mind isn't yet
moving towards details. He might want the feedback on technique,
and at this point I don't see myself doing it.
Horizon rehearsal is less frenzied today
but we still move slowly. I'm not a choreographer here, often
I'm not even a ballet master, sometimes I'm just a traffic cop.
Everyone is trying to learn their part at once and the process
becomes much more unfocussed than choreography because instead
of one head, there are seven. I've started saying things like,
"OK. One person only is talking, and that person is Adriana."
It tends to be Adriana, because she learns fastest off the tape.
Also, I'm really happy because this ballet looks really good
on her, because it is a forceful work, and all about legs. Adriana
has gorgeous legs. I felt as if, much as I liked Adriana, she
had been unintentionally shortchanged a little in the two new
works; she gets her due here. Also, the dancer who had originated
Adriana's part had similar training to hers, so there are some
similarities, primarily in their attack.
There are three couples
in the work, and in the first movement, each dancer has a solo
and a pas de deux. I've only rechoreographed one variation entirely,
Ted's, and it was amusing that without consulting the video,
except to look at the original variation once and decide I didn't
like it, I found that I had made a variation with basically the
same structure as the one I
made six years ago, but the details were more flattering to Ted.
A few solos have been left exactly as they were, others have
been changed, but only slightly, to suit the new dancers. When
I choreographed Horizon in 1993, I never regarded it as
being sufficiently "cleaned" in rehearsal, because
I had to replace the lead couple because of injury. So I'm also
fixing details as I go. I can usually instinctively tell why
I would have done something a certain way, even six years ago,
or when something just was done a certain way because it was
never specified. I try to wait before I change something that
looks odd because it often gets explained a few steps later,
or is a foreshadowing of something that recurs, but I'm glad
I'm the choreographer. As far as I'm concerned, it's my ballet,
and no step is sacrosanct. If it doesn't look good on these dancers,
I put in another step.
Day 24...
more to come